U.S. and World Newswire
:
Legal and Law
News
1-800-SKI VAIL Validated by The Court of Appeals in Trademark Lawsuit Against Vail Ski Area
Published: Fri, 15 Feb 2008, 11:20:13 GMT
Small Business schusses past big conglomerate
DENVER, Colo. - Feb. 15 (SEND2PRESS NEWSWIRE) -- On February, 7th 2008, a small business from Fort Collins, Colorado won in the Court of Appeals against skiing giant Vail Associates, Inc. (VA) over the right to use 1-800-SKI VAIL. In the appeal, the Tenth Circuit Court affirmed that Vail Associates could not use its registered trademark VAIL to prevent Eric Hanson from using his registered trademark, 1-800-SKI VAIL(R).
The small business arranges vacation packages and well-priced condo, hotel, and resort reservations at a variety of ski area locations through dozens of 1-800-SKI phone numbers. The toll free vanity numbers range from 1-800-SKI ASPEN to 1-800-SKI SNOW for his company www.Skiusa.com.
The affirmation is part of a 13 plus year trademark battle and has established that Vail Associates word mark "VAIL" is "weak" and "it is a term that the members of the commercial public have a right to use." Vail Associates first became aware of the business in 1995, but it was not until 2001 -- when the 1-800-SKI VAIL trademark became registered -- that Vail Associates felt threatened by the business and filed suit to try to stop the use of 1-800-SKI VAIL telephone number. Vail Associates started their (unsuccessful) lawsuit against 1-800-SKI VAIL in the federal district court. This resulted in a Judgment filed January 3, 2005 where Judge Matsch sided with the owners of 1-800-SKI VAIL on all counts. Vail Associates subsequently ran a second campaign appealing to the 10th Circuit Court - one step below the U.S. Supreme Court. This Court observed that Vail Associates "offered not one shred of evidence" of a likelihood of confusion.
Commenting on testimony by one of Vail Associates' witnesses, the Court noted that the witness "felt coerced into signing [an] Affidavit" and found that contrary to what Vail Associates was trying to prove, their own witness showed that "most people can't identify a specific company with the purchase of their ski vacations products. They are familiar with places to ski as a place, not a company." The Court even characterized VA as a company "who no more wanted to talk about the record evidence than a hog wants to talk about bacon...." Thus, the Court affirmed that there was neither actual confusion nor a likelihood of confusion by 1-800-SKI VAIL. The Court rejected the claims against 1-800-SKI VAIL also because "a term that is as geographically descriptive as VAIL is a weak term."
The Court noted that "VA's concern is really about disconnecting an alphanumeric phone line which provides easy access to VA's actual service competitors." The Court also commented that "VA's claim appears more about limiting access to its competition." Mr. Hanson's 1-800-SKI VAIL trademark registration still stands as the valid U.S. Patent and Trademark Registration No. 2,458,894.
After trouncing Vail Associates for a second time, Mr. Hanson stated: "VA has been highly successful over the years in acquiring valuable assets though their bull dog tactics. The tactics and implementation of their financial war chest was all about eliminating commercial business's right to use the term 'Vail.' Their monopolistic desires came at the expense of the Vail Colorado community and intentionally stifled competition. As an example; through their legal tactics they were able (to) limit our effectiveness for over 13 years! This affirmation and its impact on the community's ability to use the term 'Vail' is huge, it feels awesome to take the big dog down! It takes real resolve to fight this type of battle on moral principle, but now we can get down to business and give the consumer what they deserve, the best value in accommodations by calling 1-800 SKI VAIL, any one of our many other 1-800-SKI numbers or use our website www.skiusa.com."
Vend-Tel-Co and Mr. Hanson were represented by the trademark and patent firm of Santangelo Law Offices, P.C. and the trial firm of Thomas R. French, both in Fort Collins, Colorado. Vail Associates was represented in the matter by the Denver branch of the international law firm of Gibson, Dunn, & Crutcher, LLP.
Editors note: The lawsuit is captioned: "Vail Associates, Inc., and Vail Trademarks, Inc. vs. Vend-Tel-Co., Ltd. and Eric A. Hanson." Case No. 05-1058 in the United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit, affirming the United States District Court for the District of Colorado Judge Richard P. Matsch dismissal of all Vail Associates claims.
For Additional Information, Contact:
Luke Santangelo 970-224-3100; LSantangelo@idea-asset.com
Thomas French 970-484-0360; FrenchLaw@frii.com
Eric Hanson 208-755-2306; ehanson@atlaspellets.com
Val Favicchio 208-755-9421; val@SKIusa.com
NEWS SOURCE: Eric Hanson / SKIusa, LLC
Send2Press® is the originating wire service for this story.
» Read More Legal and Law News
» Other Send2Press Industry News by Category
More Information and Media Contact:
For questions about this story, contact the news source:
»
Click Here for Contact Information
THE CONTENT OF THE ABOVE NEWS STORY WAS PROVIDED BY THE NEWS SOURCE WHO IS SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR ITS ACCURACY. FOR QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS STORY CONTACT THE NEWS SOURCE AND NOT SEND2PRESS (THIS WEBSITE).
O T H E R R E S O U R C E S
T E R M S O F U S E
This article is Copr. © 1983-2008 Neotrope / Send2Press. Reproduction of this news article version requires written authorization. You may freely link to this article. Journalists (see the section "Journalist Resources" above) may use orig. news release as the basis for an article.
News Websites may republish the "news release" text version linked to above under "Journalist Resources" except must retain "Send2Press Newswire" as the source of this news if used verbatim. Websites which offer/sell PR or newswire services, or web promotion services, or "splogs" may NOT reprint our content in ANY form. Send2Press Newswire is a service mark of, and "Send2Press" is a registered trademark of, Neotrope. Creative Commons - Some Rights Reserved (3.0) - Attribution Required.
DISCLAIMER: the above article is believed accurate but not guaranteed, and is based on business news supplied by the source (Eric Hanson / SKIusa, LLC). The noted source is solely responsible for its accuracy. Financial/Stock news may contain forward looking statements. Neotrope/Send2Press makes no claims of accuracy or suitability for any purpose. Any opinions expressed by representatives of company(s) mentioned in news and profiles are solely those of the person indicated, and do not reflect any opinion or policy of Neotrope or Send2Press. Your use of any information contained herein is done solely at your own risk, and you are fully responsible for using any information herein, or on sites mentioned or linked to in the article. All trademarks acknowledged.
REFERENCES: 1-800-SKI VAIL Validated by The Court of Appeals in Trademark Lawsuit Against Vail Ski Area, Eric Hanson, SKIusa LLC, Vail Associates, Inc., and Vail Trademarks, Inc. vs. Vend-Tel-Co., Ltd. and Eric A. Hanson, Case No. 05-1058 in the United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit, trademark and patent firm of Santangelo Law Offices, P.C., trial firm of Thomas R. French, 1-800-SKI VAIL, Feb 15, 2008.
VIEWED BY MEDIA (and public): 1031 times (1 today, 20 this week,
84 this month, 1031 this year)
|
 |
|